Comments on: More PHP segfaults http://blog.mauveweb.co.uk/2006/10/16/more-php-segfaults/ experiments in contemporary web development Tue, 08 Jun 2010 18:23:30 +0100 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: mauve http://blog.mauveweb.co.uk/2006/10/16/more-php-segfaults/comment-page-1/#comment-33 mauve Tue, 17 Oct 2006 12:02:25 +0000 http://blog.mauveweb.co.uk/2006/10/16/more-php-segfaults/#comment-33 I am intending to post about that in due course. PHP is poorly designed, inconsistent in implementation, and unstable. It's also extremely quick to develop with for small sites with some minor scripting. I would recommend a framework like Zope, Plone, Ruby on Rails, django or J2EE for projects you would describe as 'web applications' rather than 'web sites' (although J2EE is quite slow to develop with). I am intending to post about that in due course.

PHP is poorly designed, inconsistent in implementation, and unstable. It's also extremely quick to develop with for small sites with some minor scripting.

I would recommend a framework like Zope, Plone, Ruby on Rails, django or J2EE for projects you would describe as 'web applications' rather than 'web sites' (although J2EE is quite slow to develop with).

]]> By: Philip Stubbs http://blog.mauveweb.co.uk/2006/10/16/more-php-segfaults/comment-page-1/#comment-32 Philip Stubbs Tue, 17 Oct 2006 10:59:39 +0000 http://blog.mauveweb.co.uk/2006/10/16/more-php-segfaults/#comment-32 If PHP is bad, what is good? If PHP is bad, what is good?

]]>